logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 제주지방법원 2011.11.24 2011고정842
여객자동차운수사업법위반
Text

The sentence of each sentence against the Defendants shall be suspended.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. Defendant A

A. On April 23, 2011, the Defendant entered into a contract to lend a vehicle for 48 hours at the D Office No. 205 of the C building at Jeju Island Co., Ltd., and as an agent of the Eththiopis, the Defendant entered into a contract to lend the vehicle for 118 hours with E and Fststring for 48 hours, with respect to the vehicle leasing business of the Eththys, while the Defendant entered into a contract to lend the vehicle for 118,000 won, not for 118,000 won, under the terms and conditions of the loan reported by the Eththys. Pursuant to the terms and conditions of the said contract, the Eththys Co., Ltd. did not implement the reported rental terms and conditions while lending the said vehicle to the said E.

B. On April 25, 2011, the Defendant: (a) concluded a contract with the Defendant to lend the said automobile rental service at the D office of the said Co., Ltd.; (b) as a representative of the Ethtopy; (c) concluded a contract to lend the said Ethical HHD car for twenty-four hours with G and H HHHHHD car; (d) concluded a contract with the Defendant to KRW 45,100,000, not for the rental fee reported by the Eth to the said E; (b) the Eth to lend the said car in accordance with the terms and conditions of the said contract, the said contract did not comply with the terms and conditions of the lending contract with the amount of KRW 45,100,000.

2. Around April 20, 2011, the Defendant, a representative of the Defendant, entered into a contract to lend the Defendant’s business with K for 48 hours in relation to the Defendant’s business, and the Defendant did not implement the terms and conditions of lease reported by the Defendant by entering into a contract with K for 67,200 won, which is not KRW 84,00,000, not KRW 84,200, which was reported by the Defendant.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendants’ respective legal statements

1. Each lease contract;

1. Application of the Acts and subordinate statutes on the fee table for the rental of Eastern rental car and the fee table for the hybrid rental service;

1. Defendant A of the pertinent legal provision concerning the facts constituting the crime: Defendant A of Article 92 subparagraph 9 of the Passenger Transport Service Act and Article 31 (1) of the same Act;

arrow