A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

However, the execution of the above sentence shall be suspended for a period of one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

1. The Defendant of assaulting the victim on October 7, 2017, on the ground that the victim E (e.g., 52 years of age) at the frequency of “D” located in Gwangju City around 00:50 on October 7, 2017, brought about a defect in the victim E (e.g., 52 years of age) with the president of the said frequency.

The Methical theory called "the same year" and assaulted the victim of alcohol.

2. On October 7, 2017, the Defendant interfered with the performance of official duties: G, a police officer affiliated with the Gwangju Police Station F District, dispatched with 112 reported at the place described in the foregoing paragraph 1 at around 01:40 on October 7, 2017, and H, a police officer of the Gwangju Police Station F District, who heard the statements of the victim and attempted to return to the victim, “whether the police officer is

Neina

They shall be the two-years

In doing so, the police officers could not drive the I patrol vehicle on their body, which the police officers want to operate, and prevented the police officers from traveling the patrol vehicle on the floor of the road before the patrol vehicle, thereby hindering the police officers from carrying out their legitimate duties, such as patrols, for about 10 minutes.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. Statement of the police statement related to G;

1. E statements;

1. A report on investigation;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes governing field photographing videos;

1. Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act (the point of obstructing the performance of official duties) and Article 260 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning the facts constituting an offense;

1. Articles 40 and 50 of the Criminal Act of ordinary concurrent crimes (limited to cases where a person interferes with the execution of official duties);

1. Selection of imprisonment with prison labor chosen;

1. The former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act, and Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the same Act, which aggravated concurrent crimes;

1. For the reasons for sentencing under Article 62(1) of the Act on the Suspension of Execution, Article 62(1) of the Criminal Act, the scope of the final sentence due to the aggravation of multiple offenses for which there is no person who does not exist any person subject to a special sentencing [the scope of the recommended punishment] under the basic area of crimes under Article 62(2) [the scope of punishment from June to January] under Article 62(1) [the scope of punishment] under Article 62(1) of the Criminal Act (the person subject to special sentencing] under Article 62(1) [the scope of punishment] under Article 62(1) of the Act on the Suspension of Execution of Official Duties, and Article 62(1) [the scope of punishment] under Article 62(1) [the degree of interference with the Defendant’s performance of official duties, and several offenses related to violence].