Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 8,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Punishment of the crime

1. On May 11, 2016, the Defendant destroyed the said vehicle in light of the following: (a) around the restaurant located in Yong-si, Young-si, Gai-si B “C” (hereinafter “C”); (b) on the ground that the Plaintiff was a victim D and Si reserve in the street and was bad; and (c) on the part of the victim’s vehicle owned by the victim, the Defendant caused the damage to the said vehicle to have the repair cost of KRW 2,434,800, by making it possible for the Defendant to use the e-sports car’s car

2. 공무집행 방해 피고인은 위 일시, 장소에서, 술 취한 사람이 있다는 112 신고를 받고 현장에 출동한 용인 동부 경찰서 F 파출소 소속 경위 G이 피고인을 집으로 귀가시키려고 하자 위 경위 G에게 “이 새끼, 씹쌔 끼 ”라고 욕을 하며 발로 위 G의 다리를 1회 걷어차고, 계속해서 손바닥으로 왼쪽 얼굴을 1회 가격하고 머리채를 잡아당겨 폭행하였다.

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with legitimate execution of duties concerning the dispatch of a police officer's report.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement made by the police against D;

1. Each written statement of G and H prepared;

1. Application of the written estimate statutes;

1. Relevant Article 366 of the Criminal Act, Article 136 of the Criminal Act, Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act (a point of obstructing the performance of official duties), and the selection of fines for a crime;

1. The former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act, and Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the same Act, which aggravated concurrent crimes;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. When taking into account the contents, method, etc. of the instant crime on the grounds of sentencing under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act of the Provisional Payment Order, the nature of the crime is inferior, but it is not good to acknowledge and reflect the Defendant’s mistake, taking into account the first crime, the Defendant’s agreement with the victim regarding the damaged part of property, etc., and comprehensively takes into account the following factors: (a) the Defendant’s age, occupation, sex, family relation, etc.; (b) and (c) the various sentencing conditions indicated in the record and change theory