logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울행정법원 2017.05.18 2016구단58812
보험급여징수금부과처분취소
Text

1. The collection disposition portion of each industrial accident compensation insurance benefit as of August 17, 2015 shall be dismissed among the plaintiff's conjunctive claims.

Reasons

1. Details of the disposition;

A. From November 22, 200, the Plaintiff operated the “D” (hereinafter, “instant place of business”), which covers delivery, service, and freight forwarding as business items, from Sinpo City to Sinpo City. The Intervenor joining the Defendant (hereinafter, “the Intervenor”) was serving as Kwikset service article in the instant place of business and as from February 9, 2009.

After that, the delivery service was performed from August 3, 2012 to November 23, 2013, and from March 29, 2014 to November 12, 2014.

B. On November 12, 2014, the Intervenor, while carrying out the delivery business, on the part of the Plaintiff, on the 09:00 on the part of the Plaintiff, on the 09:00, on the part of November 12, 2014, with heavy wind in the Manpo-si C in the military, milch was caused by the falls of fallen leaves and thus, by the collision with the Manpo-si electric department, the complexity of the Manpo-e-electronic department’s opening of the Manpo-si, the complexity of the Manpo-gu Man-gu Mali-gu Mali-gu Mali-gu Malili

(hereinafter referred to as “instant disaster”). C.

On December 8, 2014, an intervenor filed an application for medical care benefits with the Defendant on the ground of the instant accident. On December 8, 2014, the Defendant recognized the instant accident as an occupational accident and rendered a decision to approve the medical care benefits, and accordingly paid industrial accident compensation insurance benefits, such as dual-income, temporary disability compensation benefits, and medical expenses, accordingly.

The defendant constitutes an exclusive Kwikset Service engineer who is a person in special type of employment, and the accident of this case constitutes an industrial accident that occurred during the period in which the plaintiff, who is the business owner, was negligent in reporting the establishment of the insurance relationship under the Employment Insurance and Industrial Accident Compensation Insurance Act (hereinafter “Industrial Accident Insurance Act”), and constitutes an accident that occurred during the period in which he/she was negligent in reporting the establishment of the insurance relationship, according to Article 26(1)1 of the Industrial Accident Compensation Insurance Act and Article 34(1) of the Enforcement Decree of the same Act, respectively.

arrow