beta
Text
Defendant
A Imprisonment with prison labor for one year and two months for each of the crimes set forth in A's decision 1 to 3, and six months for each of the crimes set forth in the decision.
Reasons
Punishment of the crime
Defendant
On June 11, 2012, A was sentenced to five months of imprisonment for a violation of the Act on Registration of Credit Business, etc. and Protection of Financial Users in the Incheon District Court and two years of suspended execution, and the judgment was finalized on November 17, 2012.
"2014 Highest 4428"
1. Defendants A, B, C, and J jointly committed a so-called work loan, with the name of the lender and the owner of a house less than 85 square meters, by soliciting H and I together with the lender, and preparing a false lease contract with the owner of the loan to move into the house owned by the leased owner even though there is no actual lease relationship, while applying for the “loan for Workers’ House Lease,” which is operated by the National Housing Fund and vicariously performed by six financial institutions such as Korean banks, etc., the loan owner would make a false employment certificate, etc. on the loan owner in order to pretend that the loan owner would have received regular benefits while working in the workplace, and in order for the lending owner to make a false employment certificate, etc. to make the so-called work loan that the loan owner would have divided the loan into the loan owner’s account by submitting false documents to the financial institution, and the J and the Defendant made a false employment certificate, etc., and the I prepared a false lease contract, and the Defendant C will act as the owner of the loan, and the Defendant C.
J and Defendant A suggested that, around March 2011, a loan office located in the third floor of the Bupyeong-gu Incheon Metropolitan City, in order to use a false certificate of employment and a false lease contract, Defendant B would be granted a part of the loan to the applicant for the loan, and Defendant B would be the nominal owner of the loan, and the H arranged Defendant B to the loan.
Since then, H has made a false certificate of employment, etc. to the effect that Defendant B is L’s employee, and Defendant C who owns the house as the applicant for the loan, is the nominal owner when Defendant B receives the employee house lease loan.