logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 인천지방법원 2018.12.21 2017가합61279
전직금지 등 청구의 소
Text

1. Of the instant lawsuit, the part concerning prohibition of change of occupation and demand for indirect compulsory performance shall be dismissed, respectively.

2. The defendants are each 50.0 billion won to the plaintiff.

Reasons

1. The basic facts

On February 18, 2003, the Plaintiff’s assertion “194,” which the Plaintiff claimed as the opening of a business year, seems to have started to operate the “HA” as an individual entrepreneur by the representative director, etc. of the Plaintiff.

From the date of the Incheon Yeonsu-gu F building G, hereinafter referred to as 'HAG’ is referred to as 'the Plaintiff’s educational institute.

B. Defendant B entered into a mandatory delegation contract between the Plaintiff on November 16, 2015, and Defendant C with the Plaintiff on August 27, 2016, respectively, which includes the following. Article 1 (Purpose of the Contract) provides students with higher quality educational services, thereby ensuring the quality of education, and ensuring the quality of education, and Party B (Defendants) provide them with quality education services.

of this section. The same shall apply to

) A1 (the plaintiff is referred to as the plaintiff) shall guarantee a stable and scenic basis by increasing profits.

of this section. The same shall apply to

In order to ensure the normalization of the management of a private teaching institute, Article 3 (Duties A2) (1) 2 shall provide the students provided by A with high-quality lectures and student management to ensure the normalization of the management of the private teaching institute. Article 11 (Confidentiality) (3) Within six months of the establishment of the private teaching institute, “A” 2 shall not directly or indirectly encourage the students attending the same subject within the same commercial zone (road driving zone) without the consent of A1 to take a new lecture to take a lecture, or cause economic losses to the existing private teaching institute and instructors transferred by the private teaching institute through the act of breach of trust, such as: (a) providing the students provided by A with a high-quality lecture and the management of students; (b) providing the students provided by A with a high-quality lecture and the management of students; (c) providing the students provided by A with a high-quality lecture; (b) and (c) providing the students provided with a penalty for breach of trust with the consent of Party A 2 before the termination of the contract.

arrow