The defendant is not guilty, and the summary of the judgment of innocence is publicly notified.

1. On July 2, 2011, the Defendant: (a) around 19:50, the Defendant: (b) obstructed the Track in the process of moving the Tracker who was the husband of the victim E (in female, 58 years old); (c) obstructed the Tracker in the process of moving the Tracker who was the husband of the victim E using the Track; and (d) assaulted the victim’s chest one time on the left-hand part.

2. Regarding the denial of the facts charged by the defendant's defense and the defendant's judgment on this issue that there was no assault against the victim, the victim E and G witnessed at the scene of the victim E and this court made a statement that corresponds to the facts charged in lieu of the above facts charged. However, each of the above E and G statements made by the witness H, I, and J is difficult to believe it as it is in light of various circumstances immediately after the instant case, and there is no other evidence to prove the facts charged.

3. In conclusion, the facts charged in this case constitute a case where there is no proof of crime, and thus, the defendant is acquitted under the latter part of Article 325 of the Criminal Procedure Act, and the summary of the above verdict of innocence is publicly announced under Article 58(2)