The defendant is not guilty, and the summary of the judgment of innocence is publicly notified.

. The summary of the facts charged in the instant case is the one who mediates the repair and sale of agricultural machinery in the name of “F” in Naju-si, and the Defendant is a person engaged in agriculture in the G in the former North Korea-gun.

D The H Bill of Indictment that resides in the Military Department in the Republic of Korea on January 3, 2016 is indicated as the “J” but when comprehensively considering the victim’s statement and the agreement on the sale and purchase of the second agricultural machinery (Evidence No. 2, No. 14 of the evidence record), the name of the “J” will be “H”.

It was well known that the injured party was in custody of the place of business by appearing in the position where the victim I and Germany are entering the contract for the Track Track Track.

Around January 16, 2016, the Defendant and D met with the mind that the victim was in the absence of the victim at the place of repair business for the sales of the home agricultural machinery operated by the victim in the Namnam-gun of South and North Korea on January 16, 2016, with the knowledge that the victim was in the absence of the victim at the place of repair business for the sale of the home agricultural machinery operated by the victim and that H was in the absence of the victim at the place of repair business for the overseas business, and the Defendant entered into a contract for the victim with the victim to take over 1,70,000 won of the market price ( Germany, 180 EM, * L07530 R 520* 520146*).

H As if the Defendant was H, D confirmed remittance details, etc. as if the Defendant was H, and belonged to the victim’s wife.

Thus, the defendant and D had deceiving the wife of the victim, and the defendant and D were issued with the codinator equivalent to the market price of 77 million won from L.

The prosecutor filed a summary order against all the defendants and D, and the summary order against D became final and conclusive, so this part of the facts charged was appropriately revised.

2. The assertion and judgment

A. The summary of the defendant's assertion is that the defendant brought about one Track (hereinafter "Track in this case") of the current market value of KRW 77 million as stated in the bill of indictment with D, but it is found that he did not receive a separate Track that he lent to D prior to the instant case.