All appeals by the Defendants are dismissed.

1. The summary of the grounds for appeal that the court below sentenced the defendants (defendant A: imprisonment of one and half years, confiscation and confiscation of one year and half years, and one year and two months and confiscation) is too unreasonable.

2. It is recognized that the Defendants recognized the instant crime and reflects their mistake, Defendant A’s health is not good due to disability 4 level, and there are family members to support the Defendants.

However, the crime of this case provides 40 games with contents different from those rated on April 1, 2015 for use by Defendant A. From May 30, 2015 to June 15, 2015, the Defendants conspired to operate a game room with 40 prices installed for the game season from May 30, 2015 to June 15, and operated the game room by issuing coophones according to the points acquired by customers and exchanging coophones in cash. Defendant B provided the Gu office with forged a real estate lease agreement and submitted it to use it. In light of the size, method, frequency, etc. of the crime and so forth, Defendant A continued to operate the game room; Defendant A was under investigation as a criminal act on April 1, 2015; Defendant A was punished two times for the same kind of crime (one time of suspended sentence and one time of suspended sentence); Defendant B also received an excessive punishment for the same kind of crime; Defendant B had a great need to punish the Defendants to commit the crime of this case, and thus, etc.

3. In conclusion, the Defendants’ appeal is without merit.