Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 5,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Punishment of the crime

On September 24, 2017, the Defendant: (a) received a request from the police officer E belonging to the police station located in the Seo-gu Police Station D District of Gwangju, Seo-gu, Gwangju, for a request to clarify the reported details and reasons for the dispatch after hearing the explanation of the report and the reason for the dispatch, while having been accommodated in the Seo-gu Gwangju Bel C on September 15:25, 2017; and (b) received a request for a request to clarify the information; (c) whether the Defendant “I would like to avoid and avoid Chewing.”

A bit of bitch fluor, fluor, sound “A”.

The above E demanded that the defendant be accompanied to a district unit in order to not disclose his personal information when the defendant refused to disclose his/her identity, and the defendant, upon consent, moved the elevator to the first floor.

Defendant 1, before the above 1st floor calculation unit, as to why she would see why she would see shea, why she would shea, and why she would shea;

"A person who is unable to disclose his/her status", and if he/she decides, he/she changed his/her status and requested again, he/she was pushed off E on his/her ship.

When the defendant continued to request the above E to clarify his status, the defendant will continue to do so, and in the future, the defendant will "Chewing sick baby, dylehhhh."

Korea shall cooperate in the test

“In doing so, E’s face was received once, and thus interfered with the legitimate performance of official duties by police officers concerning the handling of reports, etc.

Summary of Evidence

1. A protocol concerning the examination of the police officers of the accused;

1. Statement made by the police for E;

1. The written statement of the defendant;

1. Application of investigation reports (verification of CCTV images) and investigation reports (related to attachment of self-defense materials by police officers in mobilization);

1. Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act applicable to the relevant criminal facts and Article 136 of the choice of punishment;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. Although the degree of interference with official duties for sentencing of Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act does not seem to be minor, the argument of this case, such as the defendant's age, sexual conduct, environment, motive and result of the crime, circumstances after the crime, etc. is conducted.