A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment became final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

The defendant, as the birth of D, the representative of C Co., Ltd. in Si interest City, from around August 2005, operated D with D from around September 2012, and D left the above company as a matter of D and C’s operating capital loans. Since around September 2012, D left the company, it is a person who actually runs the above company from around that time.

On January 25, 2013, the Defendant, while serving in the above company, filed an application for recognition of eligibility for unemployment benefits with the Korea Employment and Labor Agency in Gyeyang-gu, Central District Employment and Labor Agency, and had been engaged in the above C even after receiving unemployment benefits, was aware of the fact that he had investigated the above D, etc. with the suspicion of violating the Employment and Labor Act at the related agency.

1. Around December 30, 2013, the Defendant sent a voluntary answer from F to an investigator of illegal receipt and demand of unemployment benefits at the Central Labor Agency in the Central Labor Agency in the Central Labor Agency in Ansan-ro 418-ro, 418, the Defendant: (a) stated the “D” as the Defendant’s words in the “statement”; (b) submitted the said D’s signature to F, who is unaware of the fact that the signature of the said D’s name was duly completed.

Accordingly, for the purpose of exercising authority, the Defendant forged the signature of the above D name without authority, and exercised the signature of the forged D name.

2. On February 12, 2014, the Defendant voluntarily responded to unemployment benefits in relation to the illegal receipt of unemployment benefits at the Mine Employment Center of the Jungyang-gu Regional Employment and Labor Agency located in 15, the Defendant entered the “D” column in the written statement prepared by the above G as the Defendant’s words, and submitted the said written statement to the said G as if the signature of the said D was duly completed.

Accordingly, for the purpose of exercising authority, the defendant forged the signature of the above D name without authority, and exercised the signature of the forged D name.