logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 부산지방법원 2014.08.14 2013구합4546
파면처분취소
Text

1. The Defendant’s removal from office against the Plaintiff on August 5, 2013 shall be revoked.

2. The costs of the lawsuit are assessed against the defendant.

Reasons

1. Details of the disposition;

A. The Plaintiff was appointed as a police officer on July 13, 1991, and was promoted to the police officer on December 1, 2012, and served on the Busan Geum Police Station from March 3, 2008 and the traffic safety system B team.

B. On July 26, 2013, the Busan Local Police Agency General Disciplinary Committee decided to dismiss the Plaintiff under each subparagraph of Article 78(1) of the State Public Officials Act on the grounds that the Plaintiff violated Articles 56 (Duty of Good Faith), 59 (Duty of Good Faith), 61 (Duty of Integrity) and 63 (Duty of Integrity) of the State Public Officials Act as the grounds for disciplinary action below, and the Defendant removed the Plaintiff from office on August 5, 2013 (hereinafter “instant disposition”).

[Grounds for Disciplinary Action]

1. On October 23, 2012, the Plaintiff: (a) in relation to a case in which D, who was aware of in the street in front of “C” near the Busan Geum-gu Police Station on the street around October 23, 2012, was exposed to drinking from the E Team (F in the situation of the team leader) of the Busan Geum-gu Police Station, the Busan Geum-gu Police Station, and was working with himself on January 2008 or January 2012, D, “D is subject to control; (b)” and “B, prior to C,” respectively.

The Republic of Korea shall be the police station of N.I.D. in writing.

‘D' goes through a story, visits an office of the Busan Geum-gu Police Station to the traffic safety department, and the Inspector F.

10 100 100

"I, after I and I leave D to B in B B Berro, arbitrarily returns home (hereinafter referred to as "the first disciplinary ground") ;

2. On February 18, 2013, the Plaintiff received KRW 500,000 from G in return for the statement of inspection that the Plaintiff was responsible for drinking incidents and for the sole responsibility within G’s vehicle, after submitting the resignation on February 18, 2013, and returned the said money to G on March 7, 2013.

(hereinafter referred to as "grounds for the second disciplinary action").

On August 5, 2013, the Plaintiff is dissatisfied with the instant disposition and seeks revocation or mitigation of the instant disposition to the appeals review committee for the Ministry of Security and Public Administration.

arrow