beta
Text
The defendant shall be innocent.
Reasons
1. On July 1, 2015, the Defendant: (a) visited the building permit department for the second floor of Ulsan-gu, Ulsan-gu, and the second floor of the building permit department for the Nam-gu, Nam-gu, and (b) was in possession of a knife (24 centimeters in total length, 13 centimeters in length) that may cause serious harm to human life or body; and (c) wanting to commit suicide by tamping the apartment at a bitrari issue; and (d) concealed and carried the transition, which is an object dangerous to Australia, into the left part of the Republic of Korea.
2. Determination
A. Article 3(1)2 of the Punishment of Minor Offenses Act provides for punishment for persons who carry any extension or apparatus that may be used for causing serious harm to people's life or body, such as knife, knife, and hacksaws, or for intrusion on houses or other structures, without justifiable grounds.
B. According to the evidence duly admitted and examined, even though the Defendant was deemed to possess excessive quantities as stated in the facts charged at the time of the instant case, the Defendant was holding for the purpose of removing an illegal banner from the police to the court.
According to the records on the maintenance of illegal banners in the habitual posting area submitted by the defendant, the defendant from June 30, 2015 to the same year.
7. It is recognized that the Defendant carried out illegal removal of banner by October, and even if there is damage, such as flaging cement, etc., in the knife portion of the excessive knife in possession of the Defendant at the time of the instant case, it conforms to the above argument
(c)
Therefore, it appears that the Defendant possessed the excessive possession of this case is to remove illegal banner, and the Defendant carried the excessive possession without justifiable grounds.
It is difficult to see it.
3. In conclusion, the facts charged in this case constitute a case that does not constitute a crime, and thus, the defendant is acquitted under the former part of Article 325 of the Criminal Procedure Act.