logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울서부지방법원 2020.01.15 2019고단2611
특수협박
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than eight months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

피고인은 2019. 3. 4. 09:52경 서울 서대문구 B건물 C호에 있는 피고인의 주거지 거실에서, 아내인 피해자 D(여, 37세)과 피해자의 사업 관련 문제로 말다툼을 하던 중 화가 나 손으로 피해자의 멱살을 잡고 피해자를 주방 쪽으로 끌고 간 뒤 다른 한 손으로 주방 서랍 안에 있던 위험한 물건인 식칼(칼날 길이 15cm, 총 길이 30cm)을 꺼내들고 피해자의 가슴과 목 부위를 향해 2회에 걸쳐 찌를 듯이 시늉하며 “죽고 싶어 같이 죽을래 ”라고 말하였다.

Accordingly, the defendant carried dangerous objects and threatened the victim.

Summary of Evidence

1. Legal statement of witness D;

1. The prosecutor's office and the police's statement concerning D;

1. Determination as to the assertion by the defendant and his defense counsel on site photographs, the victim's part of the victim's timber

1. The summary of the assertion did not contain either flap the victim’s flaps or threaten the victim at the time of the instant case.

2. In full view of the following circumstances acknowledged by the evidence duly adopted and investigated by the court, the court below acknowledged that the victim was threatened by carrying the above knife, which is a dangerous object as stated in the facts charged in the judgment of the defendant.

Defendant

The above assertion by the defense counsel is not accepted.

A. The victim stated at the investigative agency to the effect that “the Defendant, who was in fatch among the fatch disputes, fatd the victim’s bather fat, fatd the victim’s fat and fatd the victim’s fat, leading the victim to the batch, and threatened the victim’s chest and bat, twice over the victim’s chests and bats.”

The rest of the statements about the circumstances of this case, including the above statements by the victim, are specific and consistent with the main contents.

B. However, in the process of police investigation, the victim stated that the knife of the defendant was the knife, not the knife of the defendant, but the prosecution.

arrow