Defendant

A Imprisonment for six months, Defendant B shall be punished by a fine of 4,00,000 won.

Defendant

B The above fine.

Punishment of the crime

Defendant

A is a person who works as the head of E Child Care Center located in D at all times, and Defendant B served as E Child Care Teachers from around 2008 to around 2014.

person is a person.

From May 2016 to November 201 of the same year, the Defendants registered as E Child Care Teachers and received the total of KRW 14,373,940,00, including labor cost subsidies of KRW 12,913,940, and allowances of KRW 1,460,00 during the above period, even though Defendant B did not actually work for E Child Care Centers.

As a result, the Defendants conspired to receive the total amount of subsidies by fraud or other improper means.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendants’ respective legal statements

1. On December 12, 2017 with respect to Defendant B, each statement of F and G in the protocol of interrogation of the suspect by the prosecution of Defendant B

1. Details of use of each agricultural cooperative, modern, and new card;

1. Details of support for B teachers at child-care centers, 2016, and the application of statutes on application for personnel expenses;

1. The Defendants of the relevant legal provisions concerning criminal facts: Article 54 (2) 1 of the Infant Care Act and Article 30 of the Criminal Act (inclusive of the Defendants) of the same Act;

1. Defendant A who is selected to be sentenced to imprisonment: Defendant B who is sentenced to a fine;

1. Defendant B detained in a workhouse: Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act;

1. Defendant A who is subject to suspended execution: Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act;

1. Defendant B’s order of provisional payment: (a) comprehensively taking account of the following factors: (b) the Defendants were first offenders; (c) subsidies were returned; (d) child-care centers were closed; (e) the Defendants are contrary to the mistake; (d) the Defendants’ experience, sex behavior, and family relationship, etc.; and (e) the various sentencing conditions as indicated in the instant records and arguments, such as the instant case’s history, sex behavior, and family relationship, the sentence like the order

It is so decided as per Disposition for the above reasons.