Defendant

A Imprisonment with prison labor for one year, for 10 months, for Defendant B, for 10 months, for Defendant C and for 8 months, for Defendant D.

Punishment of the crime

【Criminal Power】

1. The Defendant C was sentenced to one year of imprisonment at the Gangnam Branch of the Chuncheon District Court on May 1, 2012, and two years of suspended execution, and the said judgment became final and conclusive on May 9, 2012, and is still under suspended execution.

2. The Defendant D was sentenced to one year of imprisonment at the Gangnam Branch of the Chuncheon District Court on May 1, 2012, and two years of suspended execution, and the said judgment became final and conclusive on July 26, 2012, and is currently under suspended execution.

【Criminal Facts】

1. The perjury of Defendant C and the perjury of Defendant A

A. On December 29, 2010, Defendant C asked Defendant C to the effect that “The instant B/L was created, and sent to B/L by facsimile,” to be summoned as a witness in relation to the fraud case at the port of implied call at Yan-si, Seocheon District Court 2010Kadan681, and again requested Defendant C to the same effect on January 29, 201.

A, depending on the teachers of the above defendant, the following 1-B.

On February 9, 2011, the above court made a false testimony at the court No. 217 of the above court around February 14:30.

However, the facts revealed that the instant B/L was forged at will by the Defendant, and that A did not have the instant B/L from the time of the occurrence of the said fraud, and did not transmit it to the Defendant by facsimile.

Accordingly, the Defendant instigated A with perjury.

B. At around February 14:30, 201, according to the above teachers of C, Defendant A appeared as a witness of the said fraud case at the court No. 217 of the above court, and testified to the effect that “the instant B/L was made and sent by facsimile to C. The instant B/L was issued by G owner H.”

However, the facts revealed that the instant B/L was forged at will by C, and there was no fact that the Defendant sent the instant B/L to C by facsimile from the time the said fraud occurred.

Accordingly, the defendant made a false statement contrary to his memory and raised perjury.

2. Defendant D, Defendant D.