logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
Text
Reasons
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대전고등법원 2015.07.17 2014나2486
개선조치요구처분무효확인등
Text

1. The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Purport of claim and appeal

1..

Reasons

1. The plaintiff of this court's scope of trial is the purport of the claim in the first instance trial.

(b) the confirmation of invalidity of this subsection;

The first instance court dismissed all the plaintiff's claims.

As a result, the plaintiff appealed only on the part of the confirmation of invalidation, this court is subject to adjudication only on the part of the confirmation of invalidation.

2. The reasoning for this Court’s explanation is as stated in the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance, including the following: (a) the reasoning for the judgment of the court of first instance is the same as that of the part falling under the scope of the judgment of this court among the reasons for the judgment of the court of first instance, and thus, it is acceptable in accordance with Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act.

The defendant shall conduct an inspection on the duties of the Daejeon District Court 201Gahap10161, May 26, 2011; and May 30, 2011, the defendant shall conduct an inspection on the duties of B (hereinafter referred to as the "inspection of this case") on May 26, 2011; and the defendant shall conduct an inspection on the duties of B (hereinafter referred to as the "inspection of this case") on May 30, 201.

(b) Parts 8, 17, 10, 12, 8, 17, and 12, of the first instance judgment shall be followed as follows:

(1) The following facts may be acknowledged if the aforementioned evidence added the purport of the whole pleadings to the statements in Gap evidence Nos. 16-2 (part), 18-1 (part), Eul evidence No. 10, 12-1, 2, 3, and 13:

(A) In the comprehensive inspection conducted in 2009 (24.2.24.27. 2009.2.2. 27. 2009), the Defendant extended a total of KRW 5,614,775,027 to H, I, etc. under the name of the principal and his family members, and extended a loan exceeding KRW 3,778,254,253 to the same person, and illegally reduced or exempted overdue interest of KRW 125,889,00 to the members J et al. 14, not subject to the disposition of deficit, and then resolved this in B, and the Defendant, the president, one month of the suspension of duties for the Plaintiff, and three months of suspension of duties for the regular E et al.

arrow