1. The instant lawsuit shall be dismissed.

2. The costs of the lawsuit shall be borne by AF (AG).

1. Basic facts

A. The AI species that were created by the first-class doctoral doctoral doctoral degree AH are scattered across the nation under the top-class clans. One of them is the clan comprised of eight-year-old AK descendants, and the plaintiff in its lower-class clan is an AI 10-year-old AL group.

Among the plaintiff's subordinate species, there are many small and medium species, such as the AP species consisting of 11 years of age AM as a middle group (hereinafter referred to as "N type"), 13 years of age AP type comprised of 13 years of age AM as a middle group (hereinafter referred to as "AP type group").

B. On October 5, 1937, the sale of each real estate listed in the separate sheet Nos. 2 (hereinafter “each real estate of this case”) was jointly owned by 7 members, including net Q Q, net AR, AS, AS, AT, AU, AV, AW, etc., with 1/7 shares, and the ownership transfer registration was completed on October 5, 1937 with the grounds for registration. The above holders of each real estate of this case are all subordinate members of AP.

C. On December 30, 1972, the above AU and AV shares were transferred to the defendant B, the network X on December 30, 1972, and the above AS, AT, and AW shares were transferred to the network AY, the defendant C, the defendant D, the defendant M, the network M, and the defendant E.

As of December 30, 1972, each of the instant real estates was owned by the respective 3/42 shares in net Q, net AR, Defendant B, and net AX, network AY, Defendant C, D, M, network A, and Defendant E, with ownership transfer registration.

[Reasons for Recognition] Each entry of Gap evidence Nos. 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, Eul evidence Nos. 1, 2, 3, 7, 34, 42, and the purport of the whole pleadings

2. Determination on this safety defense

A. The Plaintiff asserted that each of the instant real estate was owned by the Plaintiff, and entrusted the title of the deceased Q, net AR, Defendant B, network AX, network AY, Defendant C, D, M, network AZ, and Defendant E. As such, the Defendants expressed their intent to terminate the title trust with the instant complaint. As such, the Defendants were the title trustee or their successors of each of the instant real estate.