A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for one year.

Punishment of the crime

[criminal records] On July 2, 2015, the Defendant was sentenced to four months of imprisonment for habitual fraud in the Incheon District Court’s Vice-Support, and completed the execution of the sentence on September 25, 2015.

[Criminal facts]

1. On December 5, 2015, the Defendant infringed upon the residence of the victims by entering the D dormitory located in C apartment 305, 08:00 on December 5, 2015, via an open entrance, with the victim E and F’s 211 residing.

2. Larceny;

A. The Defendant: (a) committed each theft with the victim E-owned cash of KRW 200,00,000, the market price of KRW 50,000, the victim E, and the rest in work of the victim E, at the time, place, victim E, and F as described in the above paragraph 1; (b) one verification-chlosts in the market price of KRW 50,000, the market price of which is equivalent to KRW 800,000, the victim F, the color of which is the victim, and one color is the ambace, and one cross-test in the market price.

B. On December 18, 2015, around 13:00 on December 18, 2015, the Defendant: (a) at H Company’s accommodation located in Seo-gu G 101, Seo-gu, Seo-gu, Seocheon-gu, Seocheon-gu, G 101; (b) at the victim I-owned market price equivalent to KRW 150,00,000, the victim I-owned one; (c) at the victim I-owned market price; and (d) at the end of 2,000, one hand room at the market price equivalent to KRW 2,000.

(c)

On December 29, 2015, the Defendant, at around 19:48, was living with the victim K on December 29, 2015, committed each theft with 10,312, J Apartment apartment 10,312 of Gyeyang-gu Incheon, Gyeyang-gu, Incheon, with a single 3 mobile phone in the event of Samsung Gallon, the market price of which is equivalent to KRW 600,000,000, which is equivalent to KRW 100,000, the market price of Samsung S3 mobile phone, and 50,000, the market price of which is equivalent to KRW 20,00.

3. On February 27, 2016, at the “N” drinking house operated by the victim M in Osan City L on February 27, 2016, the Defendant ordered alcohol as if he did not have the intent or ability to pay the food value, and that he did not pay the food value, and that he did not belong to it, 1 sick, 15 sick, and al.e., the victim.