1. The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal, including the part arising from the supplementary participation, are all assessed against the Plaintiff.

1. The grounds for admitting and amending the judgment of the court of first instance are as follows: (a) the “34 points” of the first instance judgment No. 16, No. 9 shall be deemed to be “30 points”; and (b) the grounds for admitting and modifying this case are as stated in the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance, except for adding the following contents after the 13, No. 12 following the 13, No. 12, and thus, it shall be cited as it is in accordance with Article

[Additional Parts] The plaintiff asserts to the effect that "the plaintiff's performance of guidance during the period subject to re-election shall not be more than four times in total but not more than eight times in total."

However, during the period subject to examination for reappointment, the Plaintiff’s instruction records consisting of four times in total are as seen earlier, and the descriptions of Gap evidence 28, Gap evidence 66-1 through 5, Gap evidence 67-1, Gap evidence 67-2, Gap evidence 68-1, 2, and 3 are insufficient to reverse the recognition, and there is no counter-proof otherwise.

2. In conclusion, the plaintiff's claim of this case is dismissed as it is without merit, and the judgment of the court of first instance is just in conclusion, and the plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.