1. Of the judgment of the court of first instance, the part of the decision to refuse reappointment as of December 23, 201 and the claim to confirm the invalidity of the notification is revoked, and the above part is revoked.

Basic Facts

The defendant is a school juristic person which establishes and operates B University.

On March 1, 200, the Plaintiff was appointed as a Japanese language professor at the Human Research University of the Incheon National University on March 1, 200 and a special teacher invited to teach the Japanese language basicization by September 30, 2009.

After the certificate No. 1-1 (contract for the appointment of invited professors), Eul evidence No. 1-2 (contract for the appointment of invited professors for special teachers), Eul evidence No. 1-3 (contract for the appointment of invited professors for special teachers), Eul evidence No. 1-4 (contract for the appointment of invited professors for special teachers), and Eul evidence No. 1-5 (contract for the appointment of special teachers), the plaintiff was appointed as full-time instructors in exclusive charge of non-retirement foreign language education on October 28, 2009 by determining the employment period as February 28, 2010, and around March 1, 201 and March 1, 2011.

On October 2, 2011, the Plaintiff’s 2-1, 2, 3, and 2-1 (a written contract for appointment of a teacher exclusively in charge of foreign language education for each non-retirement Caller) submitted to the Defendant an application for examination of reappointment of a teacher exclusively in charge of foreign language education every semester even in October 2, 2012.

around December 23, 2011, the Defendant notified the Plaintiff that he was disqualified from the examination for reappointment by acquiring 70 points and 68 points below 2 points below the passing standard point of 70 points of foreign language education in the evaluation of reappointment from the date of December 23, 201, the Defendant: (a) No. 5-1 (the submission of an application for the examination for re-election of foreign language teachers exclusively in charge of foreign language education in the first semester; and (b) No. 5-2 (the application for re-election).

hereinafter referred to as "dispositions rejecting reappointment of this case"

(2) On December 28, 2011, the Plaintiff received the foregoing instruction. The Plaintiff was re-appointed as a full-time lecturer in charge of foreign language education in B University from March 3, 2014 after the first instance judgment was rendered, and the Plaintiff was re-appointed as a full-time lecturer in charge of foreign language education in B University, following the re-appointed procedure.

relevant regulations;