A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not more than ten months.

However, the execution of the above sentence shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

1. On March 6, 2016, the Defendant: (a) driven a motor vehicle with a alcohol level of at least 0.157% in blood alcohol level from the 4km section around a new bank located in the Southern-dong, Tyang-dong on March 6, 2016 to the road near the same intersection in the same intersection, while under the influence of alcohol level of at least 0.157%.

2. A person who is engaged in driving service of a motor vehicle lurged by the Defendant in violation of the Road Traffic Act (after-accident).

The Defendant, while under the influence of alcohol level of 0.157% during the blood transfusion at the time of the day set forth in paragraph 1, driven the said car and driven the road near the lux apartment in the Sung-dong at the time of the tri-dong, led to the flow from the right side of the Western elementary school to the right side of the Sungbuk-do.

At the same time, they were two lanes, so in such cases, there was a duty of care to properly observe the lanes for those engaged in driving duties and to accurately operate the steering direction and the operation of the steering system while living well on the right and the right of the front side.

Nevertheless, under the influence of alcohol, the Defendant was negligent in proceeding with galging, and the part on the back part of the victim C's D taxi that was ahead of the same direction was taken into account as the part on the left part of the said A-Whn-Wn-Wn-Wn vehicle.

The Defendant, without immediately stopping, continuously driven approximately 3 km section of the victim C’s drilling, and continued to drive from the intersection of the same intersection to the three tax offices located in the intersection of the same intersection, while moving to the intersection of the police station at the direction, the Defendant was negligent in the course of leading the central line to the opposite lane, and then received by the Defendant, by fault, the part on the left side of the victim E’s fM3 passengers waiting at the opposite lane and the subsequent part on the left side of the body car due to the victim’s G driving waiting in the signal waiting.

Ultimately, the Defendant’s negligence in the above occupational negligence in the victim C’s taxi repair cost of KRW 427,480, the victim E’s repair cost of KRW 80,300 for the victim EM3 passenger car, and the victim E’s body car.