The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The summary of the grounds for appeal (unfair sentencing) of the lower court’s punishment (two years and six months of imprisonment, confiscation, and collection) is too unreasonable.

2. The lower court determined that the punishment was determined within a reasonable scope by fully taking into account the circumstances surrounding the sentencing of the Defendant, such as the content of the instant crime, the confession and reflectivity of the Defendant, the amount of penphones handled before and after the same kind of crime, and the arrest of the drug offender, and that the Defendant was additionally found to have contributed to the arrest of the drug offender in the first instance trial, the lower court’s punishment is too unreasonable.

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the grounds that the defendant's appeal is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.