1. The Defendant’s KRW 119,264,548 for the Plaintiff and KRW 5% per annum from August 31, 2014 to September 27, 2019.

1. Occurrence of liability for damages;

A. The facts of recognition 1) C are D-si (hereinafter “Defendant”) around 15:20 on August 31, 2014.

) The Plaintiff’s driver’s failure to enter the intersection while driving his front intersection from the F to the F sloping of the three-lanes from the F to the parallel by violating the signal, and caused the Plaintiff’s error of the Plaintiff’s driver’s failure to drive the said intersection in line with normal signal to the front driver of the Defendant’s vehicle (hereinafter “instant traffic accident”).

2) The Plaintiff sustained an injury, such as the Plaintiff’s chief and chief executive officers, due to the instant traffic accident.

3) The Defendant is a mutual aid business entity that has entered into a mutual aid agreement with the Defendant vehicle. 【Ground for recognition’s absence of dispute, Gap’s evidence Nos. 2, 3, 4, 11, 14 (including a serial number; hereinafter the same shall apply).

each entry or video, the whole purport of the pleading;

B. According to the above recognition of liability, the defendant is liable to compensate the plaintiff for damages caused by the instant accident as a mutual aid business operator, barring any special circumstance, since the plaintiff sustained an injury due to the operation of the defendant's vehicle.

2. In addition to the matters stated below within the scope of liability for damages, each corresponding item of the Schedule of Calculation of Compensation for Damages shall be as follows, and in principle, the period for the convenience of calculation shall be calculated on a monthly basis, but less than the last month and less than KRW 1 shall be discarded.

The calculation of the current value at the time of the accident shall be based on the reduction rate of 5/12 percent per month to deduct the interim interest.

In addition, it is the purport of rejecting all the arguments of the parties, which are not separately explained by the parties.

【Ground of recognition】 The fact that there is no dispute, Gap’s evidence Nos. 1, 5, 6, 8, 9, 10, and 13, the result of the physical commission to the G Hospital Head of this Court, the significant fact, experience, and the purport of the whole pleadings

A. Personal information 1) Personal information: as stated in the “basic matters” list of the amount of damages calculated in attached Form 1; 2) income and .