logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 인천지방법원 2018.01.17 2017고단7022
교통사고처리특례법위반(치상)등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not more than ten months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. The Defendant in violation of the Road Traffic Act is a person engaged in driving a CK3 car.

No driver of any motor vehicle shall threaten or endanger any third person or cause any danger to traffic, by committing any act in violation of signal or direction, or by continuing or repeating any act in violation of the median line.

Nevertheless, on July 14, 2017, the Defendant driven the above car on the 22:14th day of July, 2017, driving the road in front of Incheon Southern-gu along the shooting distance-passing side of the drawing from the bank of the water distribution area, and driving the traffic signal four times in violation of the traffic signal and driving the central line three times more, thereby causing danger to traffic.

2. The Defendant is a person who is engaged in driving service of CK3 cars.

On July 14, 2017, the Defendant driven the above car at around 22:15, and proceeded ahead of the 119 Jeju Nam-gu, Nam-gu, Nam-gu, Incheon, at a ethic speed from the ethic side of the elementary school drawing from the south-gu, Seoul, to the ethic speed.

At night, the signal was installed and at the time, so there was a duty of care to observe the signal and prevent the accident in advance by checking well the right and the right of the driver of the motor vehicle.

Nevertheless, the defendant was negligent in doing so and driven by the victim E (64) who has left the left and left the left at the left of the left at the front of the Southern Park at the front of the Nam-gu, South-gu.

F The front part of the F K5 passenger car was received as the front part of the Defendant’s driver’s car.

Ultimately, the Defendant’s occupational negligence inflicted injury on the above E, such as T1 and T12’s closed cream, etc. on the part of T12, and injury on the part of the said K5’s car, and injury to the victim G (hereinafter referred to as the said K5’s car) who was on the part of the said K5’s car for about three weeks in need of medical treatment, and tensions with the same victim H(24’s tax) with no two open measures during the treatment period.

arrow