logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울고등법원 2020.01.14 2019누41296
농업생산기반시설사용허가보류통보취소청구
Text

1. The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

The purport of the claim and appeal is the purport of the appeal.

Reasons

Details of the disposition

The reasons for this part are as follows: ① “the permission for use” in Part 2, Chapter 15 of the judgment of the court of first instance shall be deemed to be “the permission for use” (hereinafter “previous permission”); ② the “the above” in Part 2, Chapter 18 shall be deemed to be “the instant case”; ③ the “A separate road” in Part 2, Chapter 19 shall be deemed to be “the two lists”; ④ the “one Schedule in Part 3, Section 1 shall be deemed to be “the two Schedules”; ⑤ The “basic agricultural production facilities” in Part 4, Chapter 3 shall be deemed to be “the agricultural production infrastructure”; 6, and Section 17 shall be deemed to be “the grounds for recognition” in the main sentence of Article 15 of the judgment of the court of first instance, and the reasons for the lower court’s rejection shall be deemed to be reasonable from Part 1 to 4, Article 6 through 111 of the Civil Procedure Act (including the number of pages; hereinafter the same shall apply) and the reasons for the lower court to accept the pertinent part of the judgment from Part 1 to the first to 2, 3 through 5 of the judgment.

The main point of the Plaintiff’s assertion on the merits is as follows: (a) there is an error of law that deviates from or abused the scope of discretion, such as misunderstanding of facts, protection of trust, and violation of the principle of proportionality and equality.

The plaintiff is a 654m2, etc. in Pakistan-si.

arrow