logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울고등법원 2014.10.29 2014나2014670
손해배상(기)
Text

1. The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Defendant.

Purport of claim and appeal

1..

Reasons

1. The reasons for the court's explanation concerning this case are as follows: "this court" in the second part of the second part of the judgment of the court of the first instance shall be dismissed as "the court of the first instance"; "10.10" in the second part of the judgment of the court of the first instance shall be dismissed as "the second part of the second part of the judgment of the first instance"; "20 residents" in the second part of the judgment of the court of the first instance shall be dismissed as "the second part of the second part of the judgment of the first instance"; "W of the witness" in the third part of the third part of the judgment of the first instance shall be dismissed as "the witness G of the first instance court of the first instance"; "the first part of the second part of the judgment of the first instance" in the second part of the second part of the judgment shall be dismissed as "the first part of the first instance court of the first instance to 10.10 and the second part of the second part of the judgment shall be dismissed as "the fourth part of the first part to 1510.1.5.1.1.1"

B. It is a part of the inheritance relationship.

B In addition to the following changes, the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance is the same as that of the part of the judgment of the court of first instance, and thus, this is cited in accordance with the main sentence of Article

In full view of the respective descriptions of evidence Nos. 5-1, 2, 6 through 9, 12 through 15 and the overall purport of the pleadings in the testimony of witness G of the court of first instance, the fact that the deceased deceased before the deceased's death can be recognized in D, according to the custom at the time, the deceased's consolation money was inherited solely by the deceased, who is his/her lineal descendant, but was the father of the deceased's death in the deceased's body."

2. Thus, the plaintiff's claim of this case is justified within the above scope of recognition, and the remaining claims are dismissed as there is no ground. The judgment of the court of first instance is just as this conclusion, and the defendant's appeal is dismissed as it is without a ground. It is so ordered as per Disposition.

arrow