beta
Text
A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not more than six months and a fine not exceeding 200,000 won.
When the defendant does not pay the above fine.
Reasons
Punishment of the crime
1. Around 03:30 on May 18, 2017, the Defendant: (a) was under the influence of alcohol in the elbage of the victim C (54 tax) near the Seocho-gu Seoul Seocho-gu Mapo Tropo Lake; (b) was under the influence of alcohol; (c) was trying to pay the taxi fee by the e-mail card in front of Gangnam-gu Seoul, Seoul, the purpose of which is to pay the taxi fee; (d) the victim did not receive the fare; (e) was left from the cab; (e) the victim did not pay the taxi fee; and (e) the victim did not pay the taxi fee; and (e) the victim did not pay the taxi fee; and (e) when the victim’s right face face was flud with the elb and the balk with the victim, the victim’s two arms were 10 times more than 10; (e) was under the influence of the victim’s right shoulder; and (e) was under the victim’s treatment of the victim’s two me.
2. Around May 18, 2017, the Defendant interfered with the performance of official duties was arrested at the head of the police station F and office of the Gangnam-gu Seoul (Seoul) Police Station F and office as an offender for the crimes of injury as referred to in the above paragraph (1), and subsequently carrying tobacco, and the Defendant was different from G in the process of carrying out scke duties (a arrested suspect’s disease management duties) around the entrance.
“A person who is unable to smoke in the official note” from the above G, so he may sit in the suspect’s atmosphere.
“In spite of being receiving a high guide, it did not follow it and continued to take a heavy bath, and obstructed police officers’ order and legitimate performance of duties in criminal investigations by assaulting each other, such as: (a) the defect in which the Defendant intends to take the lock in order to prevent harm to G and H; (b) the Defendant resisting a part of the above G on one occasion due to its resistance; and (c) when the said H put a drinking on one occasion; and (d) the said H interfered with a legitimate performance of duties in relation to police officers’ order and criminal investigations.
3. The Defendant’s revocation of official order is located in the F department and office around 05:05 on May 18, 2017, in which the Defendant was on the ground of the foregoing reasons.