logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2017.09.27 2017고단4762
성매매알선등행위의처벌에관한법률위반(성매매알선등)
Text

Defendant

A Imprisonment with prison labor of 10 months and fines of 12 million won, Defendant B's imprisonment with prison labor of 10 months and fines of 12 million won, and Defendant B.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

Defendant

A and B, from January 2017 to June 6, 2017, leased the same middle and high schools in sequence 605, 614, 702, 707, 814, and 1509 of the Dongdaemun-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government Itel 605, 614, 707, 814, and 1509, and then “J” is a commercial sex trafficking business establishment; from January 2017 to the Dongdaemun-gu Office 420, 521, 821, 1021, 1421, and 1621; and from the Dongdaemun-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government Office 832, 912, 931, and 126, the phrase “NJ” is the joint head of NJ and the phrase “NJ business establishment,” the phrase “NJ business establishment,” and the phrase “NJ head of NJ” is the joint head of NJ’s office.

The Defendants issued a summary order of KRW 5 million to Defendant A on January 27, 2017 (Provided, That from around April 5, 2017, Defendant A issued a fine of KRW 5 million due to a crime of violation of the Act on the Punishment, etc. of Acts, such as sexual traffic brokerage, etc. (mediation of sexual traffic), and the prosecutor prosecuted only the crime from the date following the date of issuance of the said summary order;

Defendant

D From March 29, 2017, up to June 20, 2017, from March 2017, 20: (a) up to June 20:30, 2017, foreign women Qu (n, 27 years of age, Q, etc.) such as Russia employed in advance in each of the above guest rooms was ordered to receive 120,000 to 260,000 won from the above males who purchased the sex, and to have sexual intercourse with the males on one occasion.

As a result, Defendants conspired to arrange sexual traffic for business purposes.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendants’ respective legal statements

1. The protocol concerning the interrogation of the suspect against the defendant A by each prosecutor (including the part concerning the statement of the defendant B);

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to the police interrogation protocol to Defendant C, D, and Q

1. Relevant Article of the Act and the choice of punishment for the crime;

A. Defendant A, B, and C: each act of arranging sexual traffic.

arrow