logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대구지방법원 2017.09.06 2017나301702
공사대금
Text

1. The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Defendant.

Purport of claim and appeal

1..

Reasons

1. The reasoning of the court of first instance’s explanation concerning this case is as follows, and this case is cited by the main text of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act, except where the relevant part is modified or added (including attached Form).

2. Parts used or added;

A. Of the text of the first instance judgment, ① “52,103,200 won” in the second sentence “51,230,870 won” in the second sentence “51,230,870 won”; ② “2 until September 3, 2015” in the third part “by August 31, 2015; ③ “11” in the fourth part “where the working party works as the head of the working party in the second part of 2015,” and ④ “120,40 won in the construction cost of 4th class “4th class 19,” and “8,120,400 won in the actual material cost and implementation cost of 8,120,400 won in the second part and “in the third part of the first part of the judgment, 2015,” respectively “from August 3, 2015 to August 3, 2015.”

3. Thus, the plaintiff's claim is justified within the above scope of recognition, and the remaining claims are dismissed as it is without merit. The judgment of the court of first instance is just in conclusion, and the defendant's appeal is dismissed as it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.

arrow