The defendant is not guilty, and the summary of the judgment shall be published.

1. The summary of the facts charged is Defendant A (A) is a person who has operated the DNA in C.

At around 11:20 on November 1, 201, the Defendant: (a) stolen the amount of KRW 3,900,000 in the amount of KRW 3,00,00 among the victims (e.g., two million checks, cash 6.50,500 won, five hundreds), in a manner that the victim E (e.g., 57 years of age) was laid down on a ice-cream c with a vice-ju.

2. The Defendant alleged that the victim did not take a shelter and did not bring about the victim. Thus, it is not sufficient to acknowledge the Defendant’s statement in the second trial record, the witness E, F, and G’s statement in the witness E, F, and the second trial record, the E, H, F, and G’s statement written by the judicial police officer, and each statement in the witness statement in E, H, F, and G, and the result of the prosecutor’s inspection of the falsified detection machine, and there is no other obvious evidence to acknowledge it otherwise.

Therefore, since the facts charged in this case constitute a case where there is no proof of a crime, the court acquitted the defendant under the latter part of Article 325 of the Criminal Procedure Act, and publicly announced the summary of the judgment under Article 58