The defendant is not guilty, and the summary of the judgment of innocence is publicly notified.

1. The summary of the facts charged is that the Defendant, around May 7, 2012, leased the 6th floor of the above building to the victim E a deposit of KRW 3 million, KRW 1,500,000,000 per month, and KRW 300,000,000 for monthly management expenses. On the ground that the victim E was unpaid water and electricity charges, the Defendant obstructed all of the operation of the victim and invaded into the victim’s residence for the purpose of inspecting the facilities, and damaged the victim’s property by removing locks (locked) from the same date and at the same place so that the victim may not have access to the said F, and installing other locks.

2. The examination of the accused prepared by the judicial police assistant, and the examination of the accused's suspect prepared by the judicial police assistant, is not admitted as evidence because the accused denies the facts of crime, and thus, it cannot be admitted as evidence.

In addition, each statement of E prepared by the assistant judicial police officer and each written statement of E shall not be admissible as evidence since the defendant did not consent to the admissibility of evidence and the authenticity of the formation is not recognized by the original statement.

In addition, even if all the evidence submitted by the prosecutor are comprehensive, it is insufficient to recognize the facts charged, and there is no other evidence.

3. In conclusion, the facts charged in this case constitute a case where there is no proof of crime, and thus, the defendant is acquitted under the latter part of Article 325 of the Criminal Procedure Act, and the summary of the above verdict of innocence is publicly announced under Article 58(2)