logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2020.02.07 2019고단7951
성매매알선등행위의처벌에관한법률위반(성매매알선등)
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than eight months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Criminal facts

The Defendant, from April 2019 to March 2019, operates a commercial sex trafficking business establishment with the trade name “C” from the third floor of the building located in Dongjak-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government.

7. Until December 26, 200, 110,000 won was delivered from many and unspecified male customers with 20 minutes of marina and 10,000 won for each sex relation, and it had pre-employed female employees do sexual intercourse with the above male customers.

Accordingly, the defendant arranged sexual traffic for business purposes.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Written statements prepared in D;

1. Application of statutes on site photographs;

1. Articles 19 (2) 1 and 19 (2) 1 of the Act on the Punishment of Acts of Arranging Sexual Traffic and the Selection of Imprisonment with prison labor concerning facts constituting an offense;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act (The following extenuating circumstances among the reasons for sentencing);

1. The latter part of Article 25 of the Act on the Punishment of Acts of Arranging Sexual Traffic [Calculation of Additional Collection] 13,950,000 won earned during the business period of the instant sexual traffic establishment: In light of the fact that the Defendant stated in the prosecutor's investigation that three of the average male number of sexual traffic per day was three to four average customers per day (3 to four), the average male number of sexual traffic per day shall be deemed three (181 pages of the evidence record) x the Defendant stated in the prosecutor's investigation that the Defendant paid 60,000 won out of 1.1,00 won per time of sexual traffic to a female woman as a price for sexual traffic (181 of the evidence record), and in light of the fact that D, which is a female woman of sexual traffic, has stated that the Defendant received 60,000 won per time of sexual traffic from the Defendant from the police investigation (the evidence record No. 8).

On April 24, 2019, the defendant, from April 2019, made a statement that he operated the instant sexual traffic business from around 93 days to April 2019, but did not state specific date.

arrow