Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 5,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Punishment of the crime

The defendant is a person who operates a sexual traffic business in the name of "C with approximately 70 square meters, five rooms, and five rooms in the area of 2nd floor in Bupyeong-si, Seoul Special Metropolitan City."

1. From June 25, 2014 to October 7, 2014 of the same year, the Defendant: (a) from unspecific male descendants found in the above “C” business from around July 25, 2014, the Defendant: (b) assessed the sexual organ of the male grandchildren with the amount of KRW 80,00 to KRW 110,00 as the price for sexual traffic; or (c) committed sexual intercourse on an average of 1-2 occasions a day by directly engaging in sexual intercourse.

2. Around October 7, 2014, the Defendant employed a female employee D at the above “C” business, and provided a man’s hand with the amount of KRW 110,000 to the guest room by receiving the money from an unspecified male descendant who found the place, and provided a man’s handon with the money of KRW 110,00,00, and arranged sexual traffic by allowing the said female employee to conduct sexual intercourse with the male hand.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. A certificate and written statement;

1. Application of seizure records, list of seizure, on-site photographs and statutes;

1. Relevant Articles 19 (2) 1 and 21 (1) of the Act on the Punishment of Acts of Arranging Sexual Traffic and the Punishment of Acts of Arranging Sexual Traffic concerning facts constituting an offense, the choice of punishment and the choice of fines;

1. Of concurrent crimes, the former part of Article 37, Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the Criminal Act;

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. Article 25 of the Act on the Punishment, etc. of Acts of Arranging Sexual Traffic;

1. The reason for sentencing under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act of the provisional payment order is against the defendant's wrong judgment, and the defendant's age, character and conduct, environment, motive, means and consequence of the crime, circumstances after the crime, etc. shall be determined as the same as the order in a comprehensive manner.