logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울행정법원 2017.05.18 2016구합55490
유족급여및장의비부지급처분취소
Text

1. All of the plaintiffs' claims are dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit are assessed against the plaintiffs.

Reasons

1. Details of the disposition;

A. On December 11, 2006, deceased C (D students, hereinafter “the deceased”) joined Young Construction Co., Ltd. and worked as a transport agent of the building. On December 21, 2006, in the process of work around 17:00, "the first injury" occurred, and due to the first injury, after the second injury, she was suffering from a postary gift (hereinafter “the first injury after the disease”) such as anti-deflation, verbal disorder, dystrophism, acute strophism, hystrophism, and neutism, etc. (hereinafter “first injury after the disease”). In the event of the first injury branch, at the same time, the first injury and subsequent injury were caused.

The Deceased was approved by the Defendant as an occupational accident with respect to the first injury, disease, and post-treatment, and the treatment was completed on June 26, 2012.

B. Around March 31, 2009, the Deceased was determined by the Defendant as “a person who needs to have a serious disability in the function or mental function of the neurosis at all times” under Article 1 subparag. 3 of the disability grade, and was paid disability compensation benefits from April 1, 2009.

C. On September 13, 2013, the Deceased: (a) caused blood from cerebral cerebral cerebral cerebral cerebral cerebral cerebral cerebral Organisms (hereinafter “the instant injury”); (b) discovered as a result of the occurrence, and was transferred to an emergency room for the E Hospital.

Although the Deceased filed an application with the Defendant for additional and additional medical care due to the instant injury and disease, the Defendant rendered a decision not to accept the application on the ground of medical opinion that the Defendant is a natural and dynamic disease of the principal unrelated to the occupational reason.

As the instant injury and disease, the Deceased was hospitalized in the E Hospital and the F convalescent Hospital, but the state of the deceased was aggravated, and the other disease occurred. Ultimately, around November 9, 2014, around 04:10, the Deceased died of the instant injury and disease to “the heart,” a direct death, i.e., an intermediate event, “m., an empty blood, an organ infection,” and “the state of cerebrovascular, a testamentary gift, and a recomp

E. The Plaintiffs are occupational accidents of the deceased’s death.

arrow