1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Details of the disposition

On March 2, 2004, the deceased B (hereinafter "the deceased"), who is the husband of the plaintiff, was under medical care until May 25, 2006 after having been granted by the defendant as an occupational injury or disease (hereinafter "existing approved injury or disease"), and completed medical care after receiving medical care until May 25, 2006.

On January 17, 2014, the Deceased was under operation to remove straws inside the registry and became her home with the Plaintiff. The Plaintiff was waiting for the Deceased, but the Deceased was under the accident where the Deceased was her, alone, going up with the stairs (hereinafter referred to as “instant accident”).

As a result, the Deceased was suffering from an injury from an injury from a fluoral fluoral surgery and an injury from a fluoral fluoral surgery (hereinafter “the injury of this case”).

On February 17, 2014, the Plaintiff filed an application for additional medical care and additional medical care for the instant injury and disease with the Defendant, but the Defendant was not approved on February 27, 2014 on the ground that the instant injury and disease were two injury and disease occurred during his personal activities and cannot be found medical superior between the previous injury and disease in the instant injury and disease.

On the other hand, while the deceased was hospitalized in a sanatorium due to the instant injury and was receiving medical treatment, on February 12, 2016, the deceased died from acute cardiopulmonary death (direct death), multi-pact long-term depression (the intermediate events), and acute hemopsis (the sponsor).

On March 2016, the Plaintiff filed a claim with the Defendant for the payment of survivors’ benefits and funeral expenses on the ground that the death of the deceased was caused by the aggravation or aggravation of the existing approved injury and disease, and constitutes occupational accidents. However, on May 11, 2016, the Defendant refused the payment on the ground that the deceased’s death was caused by the aftermath of the instant injury and disease caused by his personal accident.

(hereinafter referred to as “instant disposition”) recognition.