Escopics
Defendant
Prosecutor
Maapju
Text
A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for four months.
Criminal facts
On September 30, 2009, at around 00:10, the Defendant demanded that the Defendant comply with a drinking test by inserting the breath of a drinking measuring instrument for about 30 minutes during the influence of alcohol, on the grounds that there are reasonable grounds to recognize that the Defendant driven under the influence of alcohol, such as drinking, smelling and smelling, from Nonindicted 1 to Nonindicted 1, belonging to the police station of the Cheongju-gu Police Station belonging to the said district, in the Gangseo-gu, Chungcheongnam-gu, Chungcheongnam-gu, Chungcheongnam-gu, Chungcheongnam-do.
Nevertheless, the Defendant avoided sob while under the influence of alcohol and did not comply with a police officer’s request for a sobreath test without justifiable grounds.
Summary of Evidence
1. Defendant's legal statement;
1. The police statement of Nonindicted Party 2
1. On-site reports and field photographs of a host driver;
Application of Statutes
1. Article relevant to the facts constituting an offense and the selection of punishment;
Articles 150 subparag. 2 and 44(2) of the former Road Traffic Act (amended by Act No. 9580 of Apr. 1, 2009), the choice of imprisonment
Judges Kim Jong-chul