logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2016.04.29 2016고단485
성매매알선등행위의처벌에관한법률위반(성매매알선등)
Text

Defendant

A Imprisonment with prison labor of eight months and a fine of four million won; imprisonment with prison labor of six months and fine of two million won; and Defendant C.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

[criminal record] On June 25, 2015, Defendant B appealed from the Seoul Southern District Court for a two-year suspended sentence of imprisonment for fraud, etc. and is still pending in the appellate trial.

[2] Defendant A, as a business owner operating a sexual traffic establishment under the trade name of “E (F in the explanation of the business publicized on the Internet)” on the second floor of Seongdong-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government D D Building, is in charge of soliciting sexual traffic women and advertising of business establishments. Defendant B, as the head of the business office of the above business establishment, is in charge of managing business establishments, such as customer guidance, settlement of sexual traffic prices, and purchase of fixtures, and Defendant C, as an employee of the above business establishment, planned to engage in sexual traffic mediation business by assisting the business affairs of Defendant B.

Accordingly, on September 10, 2015, the Defendants received 130,000 won as the price for sexual traffic at the above businesses around 00:10,00 won, notified the purchaser of sexual intercourse with H (S) who is a woman for sexual traffic from September 1, 2015 to the 10th of the same month (Provided, That Defendant C is from September 9 to the 10th of the same month) by employing female sex trafficking, such as J, K, L, M, N (each example), etc., to have sexual intercourse with female customers.

As a result, Defendants conspired to act as commercial sex acts such as brokerage.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendants’ respective legal statements

1. The protocol concerning the interrogation of the Defendants to the prosecution

1. A protocol concerning the examination of each police officer in relation to G or H;

1. Seizure records;

1. Application of each statute on photographs;

1. Relevant legal provisions and the choice of punishment concerning the facts constituting the crime

(a) Defendant A and B: Article 19(2)1 and Article 24 of the Act on the Punishment of Acts of Arranging Sexual Traffic, Etc., and Article 30 of the Criminal Act (Concurrent Imposition of Imprisonment and fines)

B. Defendant C: Article 19(2)1 of the Act on the Punishment of Acts, Including Arrangement of Commercial Sex Acts, Etc. and Article 30 of the Criminal Act (i.e., the short term of punishment, the period of participation in the crime with an employee, and the absence of force and reflects on the same kind of crime)

1. A workhouse;

arrow