logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
Text
Reasons
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 창원지방법원 통영지원 2017.10.27 2017고단1073
성매매알선등행위의처벌에관한법률위반(성매매알선등)
Text

Defendant

A shall be punished by a fine of KRW 5 million, by a fine of KRW 1.5 million, by a fine of KRW 1.5 million, and by a fine of KRW 1 million.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. From October 1, 2015 to May 1, 2016, Defendant A employed Defendant A, etc. from F in the Defendant’s operation on the E 2nd floor to female sexual traffic in Thailand (hereinafter “S”), Defendant A received KRW 1.40,00 from an unspecified number of unspecified gender buyers who found the said establishment, with the price for sexual traffic, and had employees of Thailand sexual traffic enter into a sexual relationship with the male sex purchase.

Accordingly, the defendant arranged sexual traffic for business purposes.

2. Defendant B, on October 1, 2015, received KRW 200,000 from around October 1, 2015 to around May 1, 2016, and served as an employee of the said FF business, and received KRW 1.40,000 from the male male sexual traffic female workers in Thailand, he/she was able to facilitate the brokerage business of sexual traffic in Thailand, by providing guidance to a room where sexual traffic is being purchased.

3. Defendant C, from March 20, 2016 to May 1, 2016, had the Defendant received KRW 50,000 per day from around March 20, 201, and had the Defendant worked as an employee of the said F business establishment, and had 1,40,000 won from the male and female workers who purchased sexual traffic in Thailand provided guidance to the room where they purchase gender, thereby facilitating the said A’s sexual traffic brokerage business.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendants’ legal statement

1. Each written statement of G, I and J;

1. Each report on investigation;

1. Application of seizure records and statutes concerning the list of seizure;

1. Article 19(2)1 of the Act on the Punishment, etc. of Acts of Arranging, etc. sexual traffic: Defendant B: Article 19(2)1 of the Act on the Punishment, etc. of Acts of Arranging, etc. of Arranging, Defendant C: Article 32(1)1 of the Criminal Act; Article 19(2)1 of the same Act; Article 32(2)1 of the same Act on the Punishment, etc. of Acts of Arranging, etc. of Arranging, Defendant C: Article 19(2)1 of the Act on the Punishment, etc. of Acts of Arranging, Article 32(1) of the Criminal Act

1. Defendant B and C mitigated: Article 32(2) and Article 55(1)6 of the Criminal Act;

1. Defendants to be detained in the workhouse: Articles 70(1) and 69(2) of the Criminal Act;

1. Defendant A:

arrow