Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 5,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Punishment of the crime

The Defendant is a person who works as a clerical assistant from the “C” located in Gwangju Mine-gu.

Around June 13, 2019, the Defendant received a false real estate lease agreement from D for the purpose of reporting a foreigner's residence in the Republic of Korea, and accepted it. On the 14th of the same month, around the 11:00 of the same month, the Defendant: (a) on the 14th of the same month, the Defendant offered a false real estate lease agreement; (b) on the 14th of the same month, the G and H did not lease or pay the deposit under the above Y E building F of the Gwangju Mine Mine-gu owned by Kazakton; (c) without notifying the lessor I of the conclusion of the lease agreement; and (d) without notifying the lessor I, the Defendant entered the lease agreement into into into into into into into into into into into into into into, “real estate lease agreement” as the title “one million won” in the deposit column for the above E building F; and (d) signed it by the lessor and H directly in the name “I” column.

Accordingly, the defendant, in collusion with D, forged one Chapter of the Real Estate Lease Contract, which is a private document on rights and obligations in the name of I for the purpose of exercising.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement made to I by the police;

1. A written notice of examination and decision;

1. To describe a real estate lease agreement and apply the existing Acts and subordinate statutes thereof;

1. Relevant Article of the Criminal Act and Articles 231 and 30 of the Criminal Act for the selection of punishment for a crime;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. Although the reason for sentencing under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act, in light of the fact that the contract for the lease of real estate forged by the defendant for the reason of sentencing of Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act was used as a document submitted in the application for refugee status by G and H, the charge of the crime is not easy, the defendant's confession is against the fact that the defendant is committed, and no property damage is inflicted on the name of the document, the profits earned by the defendant were insignificant, there was no record of punishment for the same crime, and the process and process leading up to the crime of this case, and the defendant's personal seal.