(영문) 대전지방법원 2015.11.27 2015고단2495

beta

본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.

Text

Reasons

텍스트 조절

글꼴

크기(pt)

굵기

줄 간격

자간(%)

(영문) 대전지방법원 2015.11.27 2015고단2495

성매매알선등행위의처벌에관한법률위반(성매매알선등)

Text

Defendant

A shall be punished by imprisonment for eight months, by a fine of 80,000 won.

Defendant

B The above fine shall be imposed.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. The Defendant conspired with D in collusion, from the end of June 2014 to September 16, 2014, sent 2-3 people, including commercial sex, female F, etc., to the Seo-gu, Daejeon, Seo-gu, Daejeon, and arranged sexual traffic to inform the place where sexual traffic women exist, to have sexual intercourse, to receive 12-130,000 won from the customers, and to pay 8-90,000 won for the sexual traffic women, and the Defendant arranged sexual traffic by receiving the remainder of 40,000 won as the cost of arranging sexual traffic.

2. Defendant B aided and abetted the crime of arranging sexual traffic of A by introducing I to the employees of the H’s sexual traffic business establishment so that the above A may take over the H’s sexual traffic business establishment at the coffee shop located on the first floor of Seo-gu Daejeon, Daejeon, Daejeon, in June 2014.

[Defendant A’s prosecutor was engaged in business as the head of the branch office of Defendant A, and constitutes the facts charged, but Defendant A was employed by Defendant A. In light of the investigation agency and the court statement of Defendant A, which correspond to the change of the case of Defendant A, there is no reasonable doubt to reject Defendant A’s legal action. However, inasmuch as Defendant A’s participation in the operation of a commercial sex business establishment, there is no objection to acknowledge the entire facts charged, the part of the facts charged indicated as the head of the branch office of D to the extent that does not interfere with the Defendant’s right to defense, and the conviction is recognized within the extent that he did not separately determine innocence.] The summary of evidence is of evidence.

1. Defendants’ respective legal statements

1. Legal statement of witness D;

1. Each police suspect interrogation protocol of J, K, or L;

1. Application of each Act and subordinate statute to the police statement of M, N, I,O, P, and Q;

1. Relevant Articles of the Act and punishment concerning the facts constituting the crime;

유사 판례

-대전지방법원 2015.05.01 2014고단4187

-부산지방법원 2013.07.12 2013노1479

-대전지방법원 2015.04.02 2014고단4235

-대구지방법원서부지원 2020.10.15 2019고단3020

-인천지방법원 2014.11.20 2014고단6965