Defendant shall be punished by a fine of 6 million won.

If the defendant fails to pay the above fine, 50,000 won shall be one day.

Punishment of the crime

The defendant is a person who is engaged in driving a C-C-C-C-C-V car.

On April 22, 2013, the Defendant driven the above vehicle at around 11:40, and led to the flow of the white movement in front of the Nam-gu Seoul, Nam-gu, Seoul, to the winding area of the winding area at the front of the white village.

Since there is a private distance intersection where signal lights are installed, the driver has a duty of care to report the signal apparatus to the person engaged in driving service and operate safely in accordance with the new code.

Nevertheless, the Defendant neglected this and proceeded as it was due to negligence, disregarding that the left turn signal is changed to a stop signal, and the front part of the victim D (the age of 45) who was directly driven by the victim D (the age of 45) who was directly driven by the front side of the vehicle of the Defendant, was shocked from the front side of the vehicle of the Defendant.

Ultimately, the Defendant appears to have a clear clerical error in the above occupational negligence to the victim D with approximately two weeks of need for treatment, such as dump salt, etc., and the “G” written indictment on the victim F of the above victim’s vehicle, which was on the back seat of the above victim’s vehicle.

D. (A. 72 years of age) A. 12-day medical treatment for about 12 weeks of age suffered from injury, such as 11 chest pressure pressure cryp and sacratic safry, etc.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. A written statement of the occurrence of a traffic accident (D, F);

1. A traffic accident report;

1. Photographs of the damaged vehicle;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes of each written diagnosis;

1. Relevant legal provisions concerning criminal facts, Article 3 (1) and proviso to Article 3 (2) 1 of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents According to the Selection of Punishment, Article 268 of the Criminal Act, and

1. The reasons for sentencing under Articles 70 and 69(2) of the Criminal Act are against the defendant's wrong recognition, and there is an agreement with the victim D, and the victim F deposited KRW 10 million with the victim F, and the defendant appears to be helpful for the recovery of damage by taking out a comprehensive motor vehicle insurance policy, and there is no criminal conviction against the defendant.