1. The plaintiffs' claims against the defendants are all dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit are assessed against the plaintiffs.

1. Basic facts

A. Defendant AE made registration of preservation of ownership on May 13, 1987 with respect to each of the lands listed in the separate sheet No. 1 (hereinafter “each of the instant lands”) and the land indicated in the separate sheet No. 1 (hereinafter “each of the instant lands”) of the area of 654 square meters prior to the AF (the time of division: 323 square meters prior to the AF, AG large 304 square meters prior to the AF, AH 22 square meters prior to the AF), and

B. As to each land of this case, the defendant clan (before the alteration: AJ clan) completed the registration of ownership transfer on the grounds of sale on June 4, 1987 and May 11, 1987.

C. Defendant AE made registration of preservation of ownership on July 15, 1981 on the grounds of the former Act on Special Measures for the Registration, etc. of Ownership of Real Estate (Act No. 3094) with respect to the land of 1,061 square meters (321 square meters after the alteration) and 192 square meters (58 square meters after the alteration of miscellaneous land) (hereinafter “the exchange land of this case”).

The purpose of the whole pleadings and arguments of evidence Nos. 1 through 4, 2, 3-1 through 5, Eul's evidence Nos. 7-1 through 4, and Eul's evidence Nos. 7

2. The assertion and judgment

A. The Plaintiff concluded an exchange contract with the Defendant AE, the owner of each of the instant land, which is the owner of the instant land claimed by the Plaintiffs, and accordingly, the registration of ownership preservation was made in the future on the instant land.

Plaintiff

1 through 6 are descendants of the networkN, and the rest of the plaintiffs are descendants of the network AO, and according to the exchange contract of this case, each of the lands listed in the separate sheet No. 2 in the separate sheet No. 2 among the lands listed in the separate sheet No. 1 among each of the lands listed in the separate sheet No. 2.

On the other hand, since the registration of the transfer of ownership of the defendant clan with respect to each land of this case is made through the title trust and is null and void by the Act on the Registration of Real Estate under Actual Titleholder's Name, the defendant AE is a part of the claim for exclusion of interference based on ownership of each land of this case.