logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울북부지방법원 2017.01.25 2016가단25659
손해배상(기)
Text

1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Reasons

The summary of the cause of the claim is that the plaintiff is an employee of the Seoul Seoul Branch Co., Ltd., and the defendant is a director of the above company, and the defendant committed sexual assault or sexual harassment against the plaintiff as follows.

On March 18, 2016, the Defendant attempted to rape while leaving the Plaintiff as a hotel at night after the meeting of workplace on March 18, 2016.

The defendant committed an indecent act by inducing the plaintiff to join the plaintiff at a singing near D's end on November 2015, and committed an indecent act on January 2016, 2016, with the plaintiff's her son's son's son's son's son's son's son's son's son from the end of January 2016.

2. During three times, an indecent act was committed on the part of the Plaintiff at the office.

피고는 2016. 2. 20. 자정 무렵 원고에게 E 문자메시지로 보고싶다는 뜻으로 ‘ㅂㄱㅅㄷ’라고 보내고, 2015. 여름부터 최근까지 원고에게 같은 문자메시지로 “뽀뽀해달라”며 야한 동영상을 수차례 보냈다.

Since the plaintiff suffered serious mental pain due to sexual assault and sexual harassment by the defendant, the defendant is obligated to pay consolation money of KRW 100 million and delay damages to the plaintiff.

According to the evidence Nos. 1 and 2 (including additional numbers), in a case where the plaintiff filed a complaint against the defendant due to the same facts as the above claim causes, such as rape and bodily injury caused by rape, violation of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Punishment, etc. of Sexual Crimes (Indecent Act on the Abuse of Occupational Authority, etc.), and violation of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Punishment, etc. of Sexual Crimes (obscenity using communications media) on August 22, 2016, the defendant was subject to a disposition of suspicion against all of the defendants; in a case where the plaintiff filed a complaint against the plaintiff, the decision was dismissed on October 26, 2016, and in light of this, the statement of evidence Nos. 1 and 5 alone is insufficient to acknowledge the above facts of sexual assault or sexual harassment, and there is no other evidence

Therefore, the plaintiff's claim is dismissed as it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.

arrow