logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2018.06.08 2018고단585
사기
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for one year.

Seized evidence No. 1 shall be confiscated.

The defendant 120. 120.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

[2018 Highest 585] The Defendant, around 19:43 on December 5, 2017, connected to the Internet NA101 in Gangnam-gu Seoul, Seoul, and the Internet NAVV, using a mobile phone, and inserted the victim M in the middleest and on the bulletin board of the country.

The phrase “to deliver money by visiting the victim and communicating the money to the victim” will be delivered on the face of the transfer.

A false statement was made.

However, as the defendant did not have a gymmetricization, he did not have intention or ability to sell it to the victim.

The Defendant: (a) by deceiving the victim as above; (b) received 180,000 won in the name of sales proceeds from the national bank account (N) in the name of the Defendant at once from the victim; and (c) received 3,868,000 won in total as sales proceeds from the victims over 16 times from December 5, 2017 to December 28, 2017, as shown in the list of crimes committed in the attached Table.

[2018 Highest 2589] On January 6, 2018, the Defendant, using his/her mobile phone in Gangnam-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government L 101, access to the bulletin board of the country (htp://cafe.naver.com/joint longgora). The victimO purchases the total of Lone Star Non-Skira.

Recognizing that the letter was posted, “The 200,000 non-shot guns” will be sold in 200,000.

If money is deposited first, it is intended to send the goods.

“A false statement” was made.

However, in fact, the Defendant did not own goods that an unspecified victim, such as Saturdays’s total bomb, intended to purchase, and did not intend to purchase goods by any other means, and the Defendant sold goods against those who written a letter that it added a specific goods from the beginning.

Since the purpose of acquiring only the amount of the goods was false, there was no intention or ability to engage in the normal trade.

The defendant.

arrow