logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 부산지방법원 2012.06.29 2012고단3765
마약류관리에관한법률위반(향정)등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than one year and six months.

10,000 won shall be additionally collected from the defendant.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On January 20, 2009, the Defendant was sentenced to imprisonment with prison labor for murder and attempted murder at Busan District Court on February 19, 201, and completed the execution of the above punishment on February 19, 201, and is not a person handling narcotics.

1. On May 3, 2012, around 22:00, the Defendant administered a philophone in a way that psychotropic drugs -.03g of psychotropic drugs (i.e., a single philophone; hereinafter referred to as “philophone”).

2. On May 6, 2012, around 23:30 on May 6, 2012, the Defendant: (a) walked the entrance door inside the detention room in the Busan High Police Station; and (b) damaged the entrance door of the vehicle, which is a public object, by attaching an amount equivalent to KRW 33,300,00, to the extent that the

Summary of Evidence

Facts No. 1

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. The facts set forth in Decision 2 of the response to the request for appraisal (ABA - training, AB-training);

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. A copy of the D statement;

1. Previous records of written estimates;

1. Criminal records, reports on confirmation of the date of release, and application of Acts and subordinate statutes to investigation reports (Attachment to written judgments);

1. Relevant Article of the Act on the Control of Narcotics, etc. (Amended by Act No. 10786, Jun. 7, 2011; hereinafter the same shall apply), Articles 60(1)3, 4(1), and 2 subparag. 4(b) of the former Act on the Control of Narcotics, Etc. (Amended by Act No. 10786, Jun. 7, 201); Article 141(1) of the Criminal Act; Article 141(1) of the

1. Article 35 of the Criminal Act among repeated crimes;

1. Of concurrent crimes, the former part of Article 37, Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the Criminal Act;

1. The defendant and his defense counsel asserted on the claim of the defendant and his defense counsel under the proviso of Article 67 of the Act on the Control of Narcotics, Etc., of Additional Collection, arguing that the defendant had no criminal intent to commit a philophone medication since he dices the coffee in which other person puts a philophone into a philophone.

However, if the defendant dynasty dynasty dynasty with the fact that he or she actually dynasty dynasty, he or she seems to respond to the police's request for dynasty examination.

arrow