1. The Defendant: (a) KRW 18,923,135; (b) KRW 16,865,423; (c) KRW 12,615,423; and (d) KRW 12,615,423; and (c) each of the above.

1. Occurrence of liability for damages and limitation on liability;

A. According to the overall purport of each film and pleading by Gap's evidence Nos. 1, 2, 4, and 5, Eul evidence Nos. 1, 4-3 through 20, the defendant is an insurer which has entered into a comprehensive automobile insurance contract with G which is the owner of F Abea car, and G is an insurer who has entered into the above car at around 09:30 on October 2, 2015, while driving the above car at around 09:30 on the right side of Hasan-ri, Hasan-ri, which is located in the direction of the same Hasan-ri distance from the front side, while driving the above car at around 0: Hasan-ri, Hasan-ri, which is proceeding in the direction of the same Hasan-ri University, without sending a signal to the heir of H's e.g., e., e., 50 occ., the above part of the car at 1,000 Hanam-ri.

According to the above facts, when G intends to overtake another vehicle on the road at a one-lane road, he neglected his duty of care to proceed in a safe way by sending a horn, etc. according to the situation of the road and maintaining a distance from the vehicle to be overtaken, and caused the accident of this case, and H caused the death of the accident of this case.

Therefore, the defendant, who is the insurer under the comprehensive automobile insurance contract with G, is the plaintiffs who are the heir of the network H due to the accident of this case.