beta
Text
1. The defendant 232,364,181 won, 149, 909, 454 won, 213,049, 196 won, 213,049, 196 won, E, and 149,94 won, respectively, to the plaintiff A.
Reasons
1. Occurrence of liability for damages;
A. At around 14:45 October 22, 2017, G is the Defendant’s vehicle (hereinafter “Defendant’s vehicle”).
(ii) A driver was driving in the Suwon-si, Suwon-si, the 317 west line 2 distance from the Suwon-si, the Suwon-si, the Suwon-si, in violation of the signal from the Cheongwon-gu, the west part of the JI driver's left-hand side of the deceased driver's JI, who was directly engaged in under the new name from the right-hand side of the course to the left-hand side (hereinafter referred to as "
2) The instant accident died of the network I and the network K on the J car.
3) Plaintiff A, B, and C are the deceased K’s spouse and children, Plaintiff D, E, and F are the deceased I’s spouse and children, and the Defendant is the insurer that entered into the automobile comprehensive insurance contract for the Defendant’s vehicle. [Grounds for recognition] The Defendant is the insurer that entered into the automobile comprehensive insurance contract for the Defendant’s vehicle. [Grounds for recognition] The absence of dispute, Gap’s evidence Nos. 1 through 4, 10, and Eul’s evidence No. 2
B. According to the above fact of recognition of liability, the defendant, the insurer of the defendant vehicle, is liable for the damage suffered by the deceased and the plaintiffs due to the accident in this case.
C. 1 The Defendant asserts that the Defendant should limit the Defendant’s liability in consideration of these circumstances, as the Defendant was negligent in failing to wear the safety labelling at the time of the instant accident, as it was more than 40 km/h of speed than that of the instant accident.
Except in extenuating circumstances, the driver of a vehicle driving along an intersection where traffic is controlled by signal, etc. shall be sufficient when other vehicles are believed to observe traffic regulations and take appropriate measures to avoid collision, and there is no duty of care to take special measures to prevent the occurrence of accidents in advance due to anticipated that other vehicles violate the signal and drive the vehicle in the course of the vehicle, or would drive the vehicle in the way of the vehicle in the future. However, the driver of a vehicle driving in compliance with the signal is the driver of a vehicle driving.