Defendant shall be punished by a fine of 1.5 million won.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, KRW 100,000.

Punishment of the crime

피고인은 2016. 7. 6. 13:05 경 오산시 대원로 70에 있는 운 암 주공 5 단지 상가 앞 노상에서 무단 횡단을 하려 다가 화성 동부 경찰서 C 지구대 소속 순경 피해자 D으로부터 제지 당하자 화가 나 그곳을 지나가고 있던 행인들이 듣고 있는 가운데 피해자에게 “ 씹새끼야, 제복 입으니까 뵈는 게 없냐,

제복 안 입었으면 귓 방망이 쳐 맞았다

“Echchch fluort”, “Nine”

Wremath Dud Dud Dud Dud Dud Dud Dud Dud Dud Dud

The victim publicly insultingd the victim by openly crypting “Arhhum, such as a math, sexual intercourse in Busan, and Chewing,” on the large scale of “Arhum.”

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Application of the witness D or E’s legal statement legislation;

1. Article 311 of the Criminal Act applicable to the facts constituting an offense and Article 311 of the choice of punishment;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. Although the sentencing of Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act (hereinafter “Criminal Procedure Act”) of the Criminal Procedure Act is true, the accused has expressed a desire to the police officer, the crime is not committed because of the lack of performance.

However, the public performance of the instant crime was confirmed through the examination of the witness, and the responsibility for the instant crime is recognized.

The defendant was also under investigation by the investigative agency with the attitude of provoking and opposing the police's abusive behavior.

Considering the fact that the Defendant’s act of taking a motive to the police who exercises public authority is an unfortunate crime, or that the Defendant’s act constitutes a crime following his behavior, reflects his behavior, and does not constitute a crime exceeding a fine, the sentence of a statutory maximum sentence for an insulting crime is somewhat harsh, and the sentence was determined as ordered.