logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
Text
Reasons
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울동부지방법원 2015.05.15 2014고정2199
상해
Text

Defendant

A shall be punished by a fine for negligence of KRW 1,500,000, and by a fine of KRW 3,000,000.

The Defendants respectively.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

Defendant

B is an in-service, Defendant A is the president of Empt.

1. On October 23, 2014, around 23:00 on the part of Defendant B’s injury, it becomes a parking problem in front of the Mapo-gu Seoul Eart, Gangdong-gu, Seoul, and Defendant B suffered approximately six weeks of the left-hand part of the 5-year aggregate of the upper-hand part, which requires approximately six weeks of medical treatment on the part of the upper-hand defendant A, by taking advantage of drinking and hairs.

2. At the same time and place as Defendant A’s injury “A”, Defendant A, in opposition to the assault by the upper accused B, was able to take advantage of drinking and scambling so that the upper accused B was faced with a face of 20 days if he/she was aware of the need for treatment for about 20 days by taking advantage of drinking and scams.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant B’s legal statement

1. Each legal statement of witness B and F;

1. The suspect interrogation protocol of the defendant A by the police;

1. Application of each medical certificate and evidence photographing statute;

1. Article 257 (1) of the Criminal Act and Article 257 (1) of the same Act concerning the applicable criminal facts, the selection of fines;

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. The defendant A and his defense counsel asserted that the act of the defendant A constituted self-defense or legitimate act in the course of assaulting against the defendant A and his defense counsel under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act.

However, according to the above evidence, it is recognized that Defendant A committed a harmful act, such as her blicker, her own blicker, and her own blicker with his own blicker with his own blicker with his own blicker with his own blicker with his own blicker with his own blicker, etc., and it cannot be deemed as a justifiable act that does not violate the self-defense or social rules in order to defend the unfair infringement of his legal interests.

arrow